The State of Human-Animal Studies: Solid, at the Margin!
On the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the publication of Society and Animals, we present a set of 14
papers obtained through individual invitations and
a general call for papers on the state of Human- Animal Studies (HAS). For the purposes of this exercise, we deÂŽned HAS broadly as the remit of S&A
as it has evolved over the 10 years to include empirical investigations and conceptual analyses of human- animal relationships in both the social sciences and
the humanities. We asked contributors to respond to two questions:
What has your ÂŽeld contributed to animal studies
thus far? What does your ÂŽeld need to do to advance
animal studies? The ÂŽelds represented in the anniversary issue are psychology, sociology, anthropology,
criminology, geography, political science, economics, history, postcolonial studies, and feminist studies.
In addition to these papers, guest editor introductions address the state of human-animal studies in
four special S&A theme issues: consumer sociology,
(4, 2, 1996); geography, (6, 2, 1998); religion, (8, 3,
Society & Animals 10:4
Â© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2002
2000): and representational arts, (9, 3, 2001). One other paper of interest
discusses a recent effort to assess the strength and scope of the intellectual
infrastructure of the Animal Rights Movement (Shapiro, 2000).
Scope and Reach of HAS
In the inaugural issue of S&A (1, 1, 1993), I called for the development of an
academic ÂŽeld to investigate all aspects of HAS, respecting animals other
than humans by treating them as beings with their own experience and
interestsâ€”not exclusively as cultural artifacts, symbols, models, or com- modities in a largely human-centered world. Doing so would secure the place
of animals other than humans in the â€œmoral landscape,â€ to use Wolchâ€™s phrase.
This second criterion for HAS is important but perhaps controversial and certainly muddy in its application. It bears discussion here. Some ÂŽelds rarely
include animals other than humans and, presumably, we all are working to
expand their scope. However, others traditionally have included, or are begin- ning to include, animals other than humans, but in ways that remain reductive and disrespectful.
Consider the following examples:
1. Ethological study of a species other than humans;
2. Anthropological study of the role of a domesticated species in the econ- omy of a human subculture;
3. Literary study of an animal as a symbol of a human trait; and
4. Clinical study of a person treated through animal-assisted therapy.
The ÂŽrst example is not a study of a human-animal relation and so is not
part of HAS. However, what would happen if the authors applied that
information to understand further an existing or even possible human- animal relation?
The second study describes animals as commodities. Arguably, animal-ascommodity is a form of human-animal relation (cf. human slavery). But if
the study exclusively describes the impact of that commodity in human eco- nomic terms, is it part of HAS?
The third and fourth studies could stay on an exclusively human levelâ€”
describing, respectively, how a particular symbol works in the literary text
332 Â• Kenneth Shapiro
to illuminate human being or how a form of psychological treatment impacts
on a particular human disorder. Do these cases contribute to our understanding of a human-animal relation? If they do, is it in a way in which
the animal is treated as a being with his or her own experience and interests? Or, are these studies more akin to a laboratory-based study of an ani- mal model of a human being where the animal is a human stand-in or
At the time of the inaugural issue, our initial goal was to expand the reach
of HAS by forming a small core of scholars in each of the existing social sciences committed to its emergence. Through the existing journal AnthrozoÃ¶s, which began publishing in 1987, a good start already had been made.
Appraisal of HAS
This issue is an attempt to assess our progress. My general impression is that
our gains are modest. I must admit that the set of papers as a whole are less
positive in their assessments than I had anticipated, and I have changed my
view accordingly. I invite readers to submit comments on HAS as a whole
or within any given discipline of interest.
In terms of the goal of a core set of scholars in existing disciplines, we have
made some progress. In the ÂŽelds of sociology, psychology, and geography, we have such a core. Currently, the ÂŽrst two of these are attempting to form
a section or division within the respective major professional organizations. Although neither yet has been successful, both have made good progress
and, in the process, have identiÂŽed a larger group of scholars interested in
HAS. However, in political science, history, criminology, feminist studies, and
post-colonial studies only a very few scholars are working in HAS. In eco- nomics, there is, to date, only a programmatic call for HAS studies.
Turning to the papers in this issue, Gerbasi, Anderson, Gerbasi, and Coultis
report progress in HAS as measured by doctoral dissertations completed in
HAS in the 1980s versus the 1990s. (See list at psyeta.org/dissertations/dissertations.html). On the positive side, numbers increased more in the 1990s
and at a faster rate than the increase in numbers of all dissertations. However,
the authors also found a diffused distribution of university sites and advisors. In other words, HAS is not ÂŽnding institutional-based homesâ€”sites that
Introduction Â• 333
provide robust and ongoing research programs. Related to this is the relative
lack of academic programs within the purview of HAS. By contrast, there are
at least 650 womenâ€™s studies programs or departments in U.S. institutions
Running through many of the papers on speciÂŽc ÂŽelds is the view that HAS, at best, has attained marginal standing. Raupp speaks of a â€œfurry ceilingâ€ in
clinical psychology. Arluke refers to the â€œlack of interest within sociology of
animal studies.â€ Although noting an increased visibility in criminology, Beirne
refers to â€œprofessional marginalization.â€ In political science, Garner sees HAS
as a â€œperipheral part of the mainstream;â€ and Birke speaks of the â€œabsenceâ€ of animals other than humans in feminist studies. Clearly, the goal of a committed core of scholars in various ÂŽelds, to the limited degree achieved to date, has had limited impact. HAS gains in the past
decade, however, include access to publication venues. Many major publishing houses published several books in the ÂŽeld; we have a number of
dedicated book series; and HAS is the devoted topic of courses in a number
of ÂŽelds (Balcombe, 1999) and part of the syllabus in many other courses. Yet, we have only occasional access to the primary journal venues in many
ÂŽelds, and we have established only a small number of dedicated academic
Obstacles to HAS
How do we get from the margin to the main body of the text? What are the
obstacles to a more robust, established, and politically inÂuential HAS? Arluke
attributes a signiÂŽcant block to the impoverishment in the theoretical inno- vations of contributions to HAS and to the androcentric bias in the existing
modest efforts at theorizing. At the same time, he and others call for more
direct attention to potential applications of the contributions. Herzog sug- gests adoption of evolution as a theoretical frame, riding the coattails of the
emerging ÂŽeld of evolutionary psychology.
Several authors point to the continuing impact of the traditional categorical
divide between human and other animal being as an underlying block embodied, for example, in the attribution of the reduced category of â€œpropertyâ€ to
animals other than humans.
334 Â• Kenneth Shapiro
In the interest of stimulating further discussion, let me add to the description of these blocks, beginning in the more ethereal domain of ideology and
method and moving down to earth to politics. The categorical divide is basic
and extends to how we have named, and the exclusionary way we continue
to interpret, the traditional ÂŽelds of study: the â€œsocialâ€ in social science, the â€œhomoâ€ in the humanities, and â€œpsycho,â€ â€œsocio,â€ â€œanthropo,â€ in the respective particular disciplines. No â€œzo-oâ€™sâ€ need apply. (It is symptomatic of the
power of the divideâ€™s control over language that each of the titles of the two
major HAS journals, AnthrozoÃ¶s and Society & Animals, commits a related categorical error). Contemporary usage can be forgiven forgetting that â€œanimaâ€
(enlivenment, life, spirit) is the etymological base of animal while that of
human denotes soil. But how can we deny the modern (re)discovery of the
marvelous capabilities of animals other than humans and, building on that,
the recent extensions of both deontological and utilitarian moral philosophy
to include most animals? The Enlightenment, which valorized human being
to correct for the Medieval preoccupation with God, long ago completed its
work. Letâ€™s move on to a bio-centered perspective within which the study of
human-animal relationships can ÂŽt snugly.
A methodological or, really, epistemological block also is a serious problem.
If HAS requires a more robust being for animals other than humans, can
we know that being within the constraints of scientiÂŽc knowledge? Can we
understand the â€œworld-as-experiencedâ€ of these animals and do we need to
to sustain a HAS? Can we know what it is like to be a bat (Nagel, 1974)? Can
we apply traditional social scientiÂŽc methods of inquiry to the study of cats
and dogs (Alger & Alger, 1999)? Or, do we require methodological innovations (Shapiro, 1997)? Will these compromise the reputed rigor of human- based investigatory methods? Can we skirt the powerful psychological tendency
to attribute falsely (project) human characteristics onto animals other than
humans (anthropomorphism)? Can we bare the many layers of meanings
in our constructions of animals? Should these meanings be bracketed to
obtain an understanding of human-animal relations, or do they constitute
The sophistication of postmodern interpretative methods (deconstruction, hermeneutics, ethnomethodology) suggest that we explicate and properly
evaluate these meanings. The melding of technology that allows noninvasive
Introduction Â• 335
in vivo observation of brain/behavior relations in animals of various species
also is a promising possibility. On the ground, the blocks are more political and economic. Within the academy, many point to HASâ€™s limitation as an interdisciplinary ÂŽeld competing
for resources in institutions largely structured and funded as distinct ÂŽelds. But both Womenâ€™s and African-American Studies have gained signiÂŽcant
ÂŽnancial support. Also, it is not clear that HAS needs to be interdisciplinary.
It could stake out a claim within various given ÂŽelds, each of which would
treat HAS as subjectsâ€”a group of animals as a social group or subculture,
respectively, in sociology and anthropologyâ€”or even simply as topicsâ€”the
role of animals in the socialization of children, in developmental psychology.
It is a strategic decision whether HAS should be developed as a distinct ÂŽeld
or program and whether such is an ultimate goal or transitional to the larger
goal of assimilation of HAS into current disciplinary structures of the academy. Mutatis mutandis, should S&A and AnthrozoÃ¶s work to put themselves
out of business, with the ÂŽnal goal of the assimilation of studies of human- animal relations into extant mainstream journals?
Politics outside the academy also is a critical contributor to the well-being of
HAS as the twin emergence of the contemporary animal rights movement
(ARM) and HAS historically were, and no doubt will continue to be, intertwined. There are assets and liabilities in this association. For HAS, the association with ARM gives the ÂŽeld a supplementary institutional infra-structure
and audience outside the academy. It also gives it relevance, cachet, and a
compelling set of practical applications and policy implications. On the liability side, the undeserved charge of violence and terrorism, with
all that term currently carries, readily spills over to HAS. More insidiously, HAS is vulnerable to the charge that an ARM agenda biases its investigations and scholarship. As do most movements that challenge basic established practices, in the short term ARM is as volatile as the stock market, with no promise of long-term gain or even continued existence. Again, I invite reader comments on any or all of these papers or on my
reading of them.
* Kenneth Shapiro, Editor
336 Â• Kenneth Shapiro
1 Correspondence should be addressed to Kenneth Shapiro, Editor, PO Box 1297, Washington Grove, MD 20880. E-mail: [email protected]
Alger, J. & Alger, S. (1999). Cat culture, human culture: An ethnographic study of a
cat shelter. Society and Animals, 7 (3), 199-218.
Balcombe, J. (1999). Animals & society courses: A growing trend in post-secondary
education. Society and Animals, 7 (3), 229-240. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450.
Shapiro, K. (1997). A phenomenological approach to the study of nonhuman animals.
In R. Mitchell, N. Thompson, and H. Miles (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes,
and Animals (pp. 273-291). Albany: SUNY Press. â€”â€”. (2000, March/April). Itâ€™s academic: The growing ÂŽeld of animal studies. Animalsâ€™
Introduction Â• 337
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Online Academic Help With Different Subjects
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
What discipline/subjects do you deal in?
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
What if I don’t like the paper?
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
- When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
- We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.
In the event that you don’t like your paper:
- The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
- We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
- Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.
Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
What if the paper is plagiarized?
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
When will I get my paper?
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
Will anyone find out that I used your services?
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
How our Assignment Help Service Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.